Lead Article
Evidence filed with BC Supreme Court
Update June 10: links fixed.
The CPAA has filed its evidence with the court. The main thrust of our evidence was to describe examples of Canadian polyamourous families. We filed affidavits with detailed descriptions of five different healthy, functioning poly groups in five provinces. Each group was described by one of its members.
Lead Article
Policy consultations: going interactive
The CPAA is creating policy statements, and we need to hear from the polyamorous community.
We know Canada’s polyamorists don’t want to be criminalized. We don’t know what else they believe. We need to create a “platform” for the CPAA: positions beyond the Section 293 litigation, as well as positions that my influence how we conduct that case.
Press Releases
Polyamorous Advocates File Affidavits In Supreme Court Reference
VANCOUVER — June 3, 2010 — The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) today filed its evidence in the BC Supreme Court case concerning the constitutional validity of section 293 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The CPAA will assert that the law is unconstitutional under the Canadian Charter of Human Rights.
Section 293 affects polyamorous families by seeking to criminalize “any kind of conjugal union with more than one person at the same time”, punishable by up to five years in prison.
The CPAA’s evidence includes court statements from polyamorous families in five provinces. Each of these families includes three or more adults living together in committed intimate relationships.
Recent Posts
- FAQ: The Litigation, the Law, and the Charter
- Some key survey results and a big thank you!
- Polyamorous Advocates File Affidavits In Supreme Court Reference
- Evidence filed with BC Supreme Court
- Legislative history of Section 293
- Thanks! Survey complete, moving to policy consultation
- Policy consultations: going interactive
No categories
Blog
FAQ: The Litigation, the Law, and the CharterHere’s our FAQ on the section 293 litigation, s. 293 itself, how it connects to the charter, our position, our reasons for participating in the case, etc.
Some key survey results and a big thank you!Hi fellow polyamorists. We’d like to thank you for your contribution to the CPAA 2010 survey. We have already used some of the results in court filings and will continue to use the results as appropriate. Below is a summary of the results which we reported to the court.
Evidence filed with BC Supreme CourtUpdate June 10: links fixed.
The CPAA has filed its evidence with the court. The main thrust of our evidence was to describe examples of Canadian polyamourous families. We filed affidavits with detailed descriptions of five different healthy, functioning poly groups in five provinces. Each group was described by one of its members.
Forum
- Possible draft position statement posted in Fundamental policy by Daniel on July 21, 2010
- Possible draft position statement posted in Patriarchal polygyny, isolated communities, religious excesses, etc. by jbash on July 16, 2010
- Possible draft position statement posted in Child brides in Canada by Kimmie on July 10, 2010
- Possible draft position statement posted in Official poly marriage? by Kimmie on July 10, 2010
- Defining polyamory posted in What is polyamory? by Kimmie on July 10, 2010